Today's KNOWLEDGE share: PET Vs PETG: THE MAIN DIFFERENCES

-

Today's KNOWLEDGE share:

PET Vs PETG: THE MAIN DIFFERENCES


A basic formula for making polyesters, like PET and PETG, is the combination of acid monomers plus glycol monomers. In the case of PET, the acid is usually DMT (dimethyl terephthalate) and the glycol is ethylene glycol. These two monomers are the building blocks of the final long-chain polymer: polyethylene

terephthalate.




For creating PETG, the same monomers are used, except some ethylene glycol (30-60%) is substituted with a different glycol monomer, CHDM (cyclohexanedimethanol). So it’s not that PETG has significantly more or less glycol than PET, it just has a different type of glycol. Therefore, the -G in PETG represents the chemical modification of the typical PET structure with CHDM glycol units, or “glycol-modified” for short.


The key impact of this glycol modification from a physical standpoint is that semi-crystalline PET gets transformed into amorphous PETG. Let’s quickly review what crystallinity has to do with polymers and why its relevant to 3D printing.

In a few words, amorphous polymers have all their chains arranged randomly, much like a bowl of spaghetti. Semi-crystalline polymers contain regions of crystallinity where chains are highly-ordered and densely packed. This has an enormous impact on material properties.


Semi-crystalline materials are generally more rigid compared to a totally amorphous counterpart, as crystalline regions can function as reinforcement. This holds true for semi-crystalline PET and amorphous PETG.


While cooling, semi-crystalline materials are prone to warping caused by changes in density brought on by the formation of crystalline regions. This means amorphous PETG is much more manageable for 3D printing. Semi-crystalline PET, on the other hand, requires stricter printing and ambient temperatures to prevent distortions.

PET also has a slightly higher working temperature compared to PETG due to its crystalline nature. While this may make it more difficult to print with, PET will hold up better in applications that require some thermal resistance.


You may also notice visual differences between the two materials. The purely random nature of the polymer chains in PETG creates glossy or even transparent filaments. PET, as a mixture of crystalline and non-crystalline regions, will have some haziness.


Crystalline structures, like those of PET, don’t play well with extrusion. Crystallization is difficult to control and can begin as soon as the plastic is just a bit too cool. Manufacturers often facilitate extrusion using additives that hinder crystallization.


On the other side, glycol modification of PET renders it an amorphous material that can easily be modeled via extrusion, injection molding, and other thermo-forming processes. This is the key to the success of PETG.


Source:all3dp

Visit MY BLOG http://polymerguru.blogspot.com  


#3dprinting #plastics #pet #petg #molding

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Today's KNOWLEDGE Share:PLA BOTTLE

-
Image
Today's KNOWLEDGE Share Ever wondered how we can reduce plastic pollution in India? The Mysuru-based Defence Food Research Laboratory (DFRL), affiliated with the DRDO, has launched an eco-friendly remedy with the introduction of biodegradable water bottles. Crafted from sustainable Polylactic acid (PLA) material, these bottles not only combat plastic waste but also contribute to reducing the overall carbon footprint. The best thing about this bottle is its all-encompassing sustainability approach – the bottle, cap, and label are all compostable. This innovation, derived from 100% bio-based and renewable sources, sets us on a path towards environmental conservation and fosters a greener and more sustainable future. Source:The Better India #polymers #bioplastics #pla   #compostable   #ecofriendly   #sustainability
Read more

Today's KNOWLEDGE Share:High and low shear rate changes in Rheology

-
Image
Today's KNOWLEDGE Share If a relatively high Mw grade flows from thin to thick, as shown in the picture, and if the time needed to fill the thick section is way shorter than the average polymer relaxation time, the polymer will not be able to reach its higher viscosity (corresponding to higher thickness/lower shear-rate). I am assuming here the polymer reached equilibrium low viscosity in the thin section, say for instance because it is much longer. Any pressure prediction not accounting for transient rheology would then overpredict the pressure to fill.Of course the diverging flow will further complicate the situation and mess with the molecular orientation created in the thin section, but to what extent ? Since this is more of a reasonable "conjecture", don't take this for granted, and discuss or share your opinion in the comments. There are hundreds of Rheology papers on the "4:1 contraction flow". Not sure I have ever seen any on the..."1:4 expansio
Read more

Bibby Marine Orders First Battery and Methanol Powered eCSOV

-
Image
  A shipbuilding contract has been completed for what is being called the “world’s first truly zero-emission, electric Commission Service Operation Vessel,” which is being built as part of UK sponsored demonstration project. The ship is expected to enter service in the UK in 2026 using a combination of a powerful battery system along with dual-fuel methanol engines. A coalition of leading maritime companies led by Bibby Marine proposed the project as part of the UK’s Zero Emission Vessels and Infrastructure (ZEVI) project staged by the UK Department of Transportation. A total of £80 million was awarded to 10 projects in the 2022 round with the Bibby effort being   awarded   $25 million. They estimated the cost of the project for the vessel at $37.5 million total. Bibby Marine reports that it completed a tender process and has selected Gondan to build the vessel. The Asturias shipyard in Spain won out of a variety of yards in the UK and internationally. Bibby cites the timeline, budget,
Read more