Today's KNOWLEDGE Share
Tensile testing vs. Fatigue testing
Two material testing methods that are often misunderstood or incorrectly compared.
1️⃣ Tensile testing
Evaluates material behavior under a single, monotonic, quasi-static load.
Key outputs include:
- Stress – Strain curve
- Yield strength
- Ultimate tensile strength (UTS)
- Young’s modulus
- Uniform and total elongation
Tensile testing characterizes static strength and stiffness, not durability under repeated loading.
2️⃣ Fatigue testing
Evaluates material performance under cyclic loading.
Key outputs include:
- S–N (Wöhler) curves
- Fatigue limit or fatigue strength at a given life
Fatigue testing characterizes damage accumulation and life to failure under repeated stress cycles.
Many times we see engineers compare the materials based on the tensile strength, while in the application the component will be subject to continuous cyclic loading. This usually results in a component passing the static load scenarios, yet failing early in the field due to fatigue.
Fatigue failures are especially common in:
✔ gears
✔ bearings
✔ rotating shafts
✔ brackets and fasteners
✔ thin sheet components
✔ parts exposed to vibration
➡️ Tensile testing tells you how much static load a material can withstand
➡️ Fatigue testing tells you how long the material can be subject to repeated cyclic loading
Both are important, but they solve two very different engineering questions.
Check the 📌 comments for more info on these testing procedures
source : Damijan Zorko








