Today's KNOWLEDGE Share : Polyurethane Spray Foam – Formulation Challenges

 Today's KNOWLEDGE Share

Polyurethane Spray Foam – Formulation Challenges & How to Solve Them

Rigid PU spray foam is one of the best thermal insulation materials — but many of the problems seen on-site aren’t only about equipment or spraying technique.

Here are the most common formulation-related issues and their solutions:

1. Poor Adhesion

Low adhesive promoter content

Incompatible blowing agents or additives

Other Key Factor:

Substrate conditions (temperature, surface cleanliness)

Solutions:

Increase adhesion promoters in the polyol blend

Adjust catalyst package

Use Advanced MDI Variants

Tailor Polyol Properties for Substrate Compatibility

Test adhesion on multiple substrates before finalizing the recipe

Ensure substrate is clean, dry, and at recommended application temperature

2. Excessive Shrinkage or Cracking

Imbalanced isocyanate index (too high →brittle, too low →unstable)

Incorrect crosslinker ratio

Other Key Factor:

Type of isocyanate (Different Polymeric MDI) and curing conditions can impact dimensional stability.

Solutions:

Optimize NCO/OH ratio (index ~100–110 depending on application)

Fine-tune polyol blend with proper chain extenders

Consider post-curing or selecting an isocyanate type better suited for the application

3. Voids, Cavities, or Uneven Cell Structure

Inadequate surfactant balance

Poor blowing agent compatibility

Other Key Factor:

Silicone surfactant type and concentration are critical (typically 1–3 pphp, depending on system).

Solutions:

Optimize surfactant package to stabilize foam rise

Match blowing agent type/ratio with desired cell morphology

Use lab foaming tests to calibrate rise profile before field application

4. Moisture Sensitivity (Collapsing / Bubbling)

Too much water as chemical blowing agent

Lack of moisture scavengers

Other Key Factor:

Storage and handling: pre-dried polyols and proper sealing of raw materials reduce moisture ingress.

Solutions:

Reduce water and partly replace with physical blowing agents (e.g., pentane)

Add desiccants or adjust catalyst system to slow down side reactions

Use pre-dried polyols and store materials in dry, controlled environments

5. Inconsistent Foam Density

Imbalanced blowing agent /catalyst ratio

Inadequate viscosity control of polyol blend

Other Key Factor:

Temperature control of mixing and heating equipment also affects density

Solutions:

Optimize catalyst mix to synchronize gelling vs. blowing reactions

Adjust polyol viscosity with plasticizers or pre-blending

Monitor raw material and equipment temperatures for consistent sprayability

Spray foam issues are often formulation-driven, not just equipment-related.

Here’s what really matters:

- Adhesion → Add coupling agents+ensure clean substrates

- Shrinkage/Cracking →Keep isocyanate index ~100–110

- Cell Structure →Optimize silicone surfactant & blowing agent match

- Moisture Control →Use pre-dried polyols +reduce water

source : F Homayouni

#Polyurethane