Thursday, August 5, 2021

Filament Winding Process

 📢Time to Get Technical...📢


Let's learn more about filament winding!


Filament winding consists of winding continuous rovings of fiber onto a rotating mandrel in predetermined patterns. This method of manufacturing provides the greatest control over fiber placement and uniformity of structure.




The mandrel configuration corresponds to the internal surface of the component to be produced. Material compaction is accomplished owing to the component of the tensile stress normal to the mandrel surface. Material layers are formed with each wind offset with respect to the previous one across the width. Also, the winds are placed on the mandrel in a state of static balance (they keep it in place without sliding.)


The winding pattern is formed by periodically repeated winding cycles, with subsequent cycles offset relative to one another across the winding-tape width. The mandrel is then covered with winds uniformly along the maximum component diameter, excluding gaps and filament overlaps. In the case of exact cycle repetition without offset, multiple wind laying will occur, with the result that a netlike structure is formed with interlink frequency.


Bibliographical Reference:

Composite Manufacturing Technology - Page 77


Wednesday, August 4, 2021

Scientists turn water into shiny metal

 With enough pressure, you can turn anything into metal, and water is no exception. However, scientists Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague managed to turn liquid water into a bronze-like metallic state without having to apply ungodly amounts of pressure, which makes the achievement all the more impressive.

If squeezed together tightly enough, atoms and molecules can become so compacted in their lattice that they begin to share their outer electrons, allowing them to travel and basically conduct electricity as they would in a copper wire. Case in point, in 2020, French scientists turned the simplest gas in the universe, hydrogen, into a metal and fulfilled a prediction made in 1935 by Nobel Prize laureates Eugene Wigner and Hillard Bell Huntington. Metal hydrogen is, in fact, a superconductor, meaning it conducts electricity with zero electrical resistance.

To do so, the French researchers subjected hydrogen to a staggering 425 gigapascals of pressure — more than four million times the pressure on Earth’s surface, and even higher than that in the planet’s inner core. Therefore, it’s impossible to find metallic hydrogen on Earth, although it may very well be found in Jupiter and Saturn, which are mostly composed of hydrogen gas and have stronger internal pressures than the Earth. Likewise, Neptune and Uranus are believed to host water in a metallic state thanks to their huge pressure.



With the same approach, water would require 15 million bars of pressure to turn it into a metal, more than three times the requirement for metallic hydrogen. That’s simply out of our current technology’s reach. However, there may be another way to turn water metallic without having to squeeze it with the pressure of a gas giant’s core, thought Pavel Jungwirth, a physical chemist at the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague.

Jungwirth and fellow chemist Phil Mason wondered if water could be coxed to behave like a metal if it borrowed electrons from alkali metals, which are highly reactive elements in the 1st group of the periodic table. They got this idea after previously, Jungwirth and colleagues found that under similar conditions, ammonia can turn shiny.

But despite their willingness to go along with this experiment, the researchers faced a predicament. You see, alkali metals are so reactive in the presence of water that they tend to react explosively.

The solution was to design an experimental setup that dramatically slowed down the reaction so that a potentially catastrophic explosion was averted.

Ironically, the key to mitigating the explosive behavior of the water-alki metal reaction was the adsorbtion of water at very low pressure, about 7,000 smaller than that found at sea level. This setup ensured that the diffusion of the electrons from the alkali metal was faster than the reaction between the water and the metals.

The researchers filled a syringe with an alkali metal solution composed of sodium and potassium, which was placed in a vacuum chamber. The syringe was triggered remotely to expel droplets of the mixture which were exposed to tiny amounts of water vapor.

The water condensed into each droplet of alkali metal, forming a layer over them just one-tenth of a micrometer thick. Electrons from the mixture diffused into the water, along with positive metallic ions, giving the water layer a shiny, bronze-like glow. The entire thing only lasted for a mere couple of seconds, but for all intents of purposes, the scientists had just turned water into metal at room temperature, a fact confirmed by synchrotron experiments.

We show that a metallic water solution can be prepared by massive doping with electrons upon reacting water with alkali metals. Although analogous metallic solutions of liquid ammonia with high concentrations of solvated electrons have long been known and characterized, the explosive interaction between alkali metals and water has so far only permitted the preparation of aqueous solutions with low, submetallic electron concentrations,” the authors wrote in the journal Nature.

Source:ZMESCIENCE


Thursday, July 22, 2021

What are SMC's? How are they manufactured?

 📢Time to Get Technical...📢


What are SMC's? How are they manufactured?


Sheet molding compounds (SMC) are high-strength composite materials comprising primarily a thermosetting resin, filler(s), and fiber reinforcement (which is usually chopped). The thermosetting resin is typically based on unsaturated polyester, vinyl ester, phenolic, or a modified vinyl urethane. Typical fillers are calcium carbonate (reduced cost), clay (improved surface), alumina trihydrate (fire retardance), talc (improved temperature resistance), mica (improved weathering), and hollow glass microspheres (weight reduction, thermal insulation).


SMC is a flow molding material and can therefore be used for manufacturing relatively complex-shaped parts, although the level of complexity reduces as the degree of aligned reinforcement is increased.


This schematic summarizes how they are manufactured. The manufacturing of SMC’s is a continuous process that starts when a paste is spread uniformly in a carrier film (made of polyethylene or nylon). Then, chopped fibers are randomly deposited onto the paste. The top film is introduced and the sandwich is rolled into a pre-determined thickness.





Bibliographical Reference:

An Introduction to Automotive Composites - Page 116


Wednesday, July 21, 2021

Half of the Fortune 500 companies have lost the market

52% of #Fortune500 companies have disappeared since the start of the 21st century. 9 out of 10 most valuable companies (public-traded by #marketcap) are #tech companies


#DigitalTransformation #AI #futureofwork #success #EmergingTech #SocialMedia #AutonomousVehicles #innovation


Source: Dr.Joerg Storm




 

Tuesday, July 20, 2021

World's fastest ground vehicle!

 China's new high-speed maglev train rolls off the production line on Tuesday. It has a designed top speed of 600km per hour.


Source David Chang





The first-ever 3D-printed steel bridge opens in Amsterdam

The 12-meter long structure was developed by engineers at Imperial College London, in partnership with the Dutch Company MX3D. It was created by robotic arms using welding torches to deposit the structure of the bridge layer by layer. The construction took over four years, using about 4,500 kilograms of stainless steel. 


“A 3D-printed metal structure large and strong enough to handle pedestrian traffic has never been constructed before,” Imperial co-contributor Professor Leroy Gardner, who was involved in the research, said in a statement. “We have tested and simulated the structure and its components throughout the printing process and upon its completion.”


The bridge will be used by pedestrians to cross the capital’s Oudezijds Achterburgwal canal. Its performance will be regularly monitored by the researchers at Imperial College, who set up a network of sensors in different parts of the bridge. The data will also be made available to other researchers worldwide who also want to contribute to the study.

The researchers will insert the data into a “digital twin” of the bridge, a computerized version that will imitate the physical bridge in real-time as the sensor data comes in. The performance of the physical bridge will be tested against the twin and this will help answer questions about the long-term behavior of the 3D-printed steel and its use in future projects. 


“For over four years we have been working from the micrometer scale, studying the printed microstructure up to the meter scale, with load testing on the completed bridge,” co-contributor Craig Buchanan said in a statement. “This challenging work has been carried out in our testing laboratories at Imperial, and during the construction process on-site in Amsterdam.”

Mark Girolami at the University of Cambridge, who worked on the digital model of the bridge, told New Scientist that investigations into bridge failures often reveal deterioration that was missed. Now, with constant data coming from the bridge, they may be able to detect these failures before they do any damage, he added. 

3D printing has been consistently making headlines over the past few years, slowly becoming a reality for us commoners. Companies are building houses either fully on 3D or with most of their elements made out of a printer. In Mexico, the world’s first 3D printed neighborhood is already moving forward, while Germany’s first 3D residential building is under construction.

A set of research papers were published by Imperial academics during the construction and testing of the bridge. One was published in September 2020 in the Journal of Construction Steel Research, another one in July 2020 in the journal Materials & Design, and the third one in February 2019 in the journal Engineering Structures. 

Source:ZME SCIENCE

Our universe might be a giant three-dimensional donut, really

Imagine a universe where you could point a spaceship in one direction and eventually return to where you started. If our universe were a finite donut, then such movements would be possible and physicists could potentially measure its size.
"We could say: Now we know the size of the universe," astrophysicist Thomas Buchert, of the University of Lyon, Astrophysical Research Center in France, told Live Science in an email. 




Examining light from the very early universe, Buchert and a team of astrophysicists have deduced that our cosmos may be multiply connected, meaning that space is closed in on itself in all three dimensions like a three-dimensional donut. Such a universe would be finite, and according to their results, our entire cosmos might only be about three to four times larger than the limits of the observable universe, about 45 billion light-years away.

A tasty problem
Physicists use the language of Einstein's general relativity to explain the universe. That language connects the contents of spacetime to the bending and warping of spacetime, which then tells those contents how to interact. This is how we experience the force of gravity. In a cosmological context, that language connects the contents of the entire universe — dark matter, dark energy, regular matter, radiation, and all the rest — to its overall geometric shape. For decades, astronomers had debated the nature of that shape: whether our universe is "flat" (meaning that imaginary parallel lines would stay parallel forever), "closed" (parallel lines would eventually intersect), or "open" (those lines would diverge).

That geometry of the universe dictates its fate. Flat and open universes would continue to expand forever, while a closed universe would eventually collapse in on itself.
Multiple observations, especially from the cosmic microwave background (the flash of light released when our universe was only 380,000 years old), have firmly established that we live in a flat universe. Parallel lines stay parallel and our universe will just keep on expanding.

But there's more to shape than geometry. There's also topology, which is how shapes can change while maintaining the same geometric rules.
For example, take a flat piece of paper. It's obviously flat — parallel lines stay parallel. Now, take two edges of that paper and roll it up into a cylinder. Those parallel lines are still parallel: Cylinders are geometrically flat. Now, take the opposite ends of the cylindrical paper and connect those. That makes the shape of a donut, which is also geometrically flat.
While our measurements of the contents and shape of the universe tell us its geometry --it's flat — they don't tell us about the topology. They don't tell us if our universe is multiply-connected, which means that one or more of the dimensions of our cosmos connect back with each other.




Look to the light

While a perfectly flat universe would extend out to infinity, a flat universe with a multiply-connected topology would have finite size. If we could somehow determine whether one or more dimensions are wrapped in on themselves, then we would know that the universe is finite in that dimension. We could then use those observations to measure the total volume of the universe.

But how would a multiply-connected universe reveal itself?

A team of astrophysicists from Ulm University in Germany and the University of Lyon in France looked to the cosmic microwave background (CMB). When the CMB was released, our universe was a million times smaller than it is today, and so if our universe is indeed multiply connected, then it was much more likely to wrap in on itself within the observable limits of the cosmos back then. Today, due to the expansion of the universe, it's much more likely that the wrapping occurs at a scale beyond the observable limits, and so the wrapping would be much harder to detect. Observations of the CMB give us our best chance to see the imprints of a multiply connected universe.

The team specifically looked at the perturbations — the fancy physics term for bumps and wiggles — in the temperature of the CMB. If one or more dimensions in our universe were to connect back with themselves, the perturbations couldn't be larger than the distance around those loops. They simply wouldn't fit.

As Buchert explained to Live Science in an email, "In an infinite space, the perturbations in the temperature of the CMB radiation exist on all scales. If, however, space is finite, then there are those wavelengths missing that are larger than the size of the space."

In other words: There would be a maximum size to the perturbations, which could reveal the topology of the universe. 

Maps of the CMB made with satellites like NASA's WMAP and and the ESA's Planck have already seen an intriguing amount of missing perturbations at large scales. Buchert and his collaborators examined whether those missing perturbations could be due to a multiply-connected universe. To do that, the team performed many computer simulations of what the CMB would look like if the universe were a three-torus, which is the mathematical name for a giant three-dimensional donut, where our cosmos is connected to itself in all three dimensions.

"We therefore have to do simulations in a given topology and compare with what is observed," explained Buchert. "The properties of the observed fluctuations of the CMB then show a 'missing power' on scales beyond the size of the universe." A missing power means that the fluctuations in the CMB are not present at those scales. That would imply that our universe is multiply-connected, and finite, at that size scale.

"We find a much better match to the observed fluctuations, compared with the standard cosmological model which is thought to be infinite," he added.

"We can vary the size of the space and repeat this analysis. The outcome is an optimal size of the universe that best matches the CMB observations. The answer of our paper is clearly that the finite universe matches the observations better than the infinite model. We could say: Now we know the size of the universe."

The team found that a multiply-connected universe about three to four times larger than our observable bubble best matched the CMB data. While this result technically means that you could travel in one direction and end up back where you started, you wouldn't be able to actually accomplish that in reality. We live in an expanding universe, and at large scales the universe is expanding at a rate that is faster than the speed of light, so you could never catch up and complete the loop.

Buchert emphasized that the results are still preliminary. Instrument effects could also explain the missing fluctuations on large scales.

Still, it's fun to imagine living on the surface of a giant donut.


Source: LiveScience

WORKPLACE FLOOR MARKINGS : Simple Lines. Clear Rules. Fewer Incidents.

  WORKPLACE FLOOR MARKINGS Simple Lines. Clear Rules. Fewer Incidents. Clear floor markings are a visual management tool that improves safet...