Today's KNOWLEDGE Share : EU regrets lack of conclusion on global plastics agreement

Today's KNOWLEDGE Share

EU regrets lack of conclusion on global plastics agreement

After two years of negotiations, UN member states failed to reach an agreement.

The EU regrets that the 5th session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee on the Global Plastics Treaty (INC-5) finished without a deal yesterday in Busan, South Korea.

After two years of negotiations and a week of talks in Busan, UN member states could not find an agreement on what would have been the first-ever global legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution. The session has now been suspended and negotiations will continue in 2025. 

Speaking on the result, Jessika Roswall, Commissioner for the Environment, Water Resilience and a Competitive Circular Economy said:

“I strongly regret that there is no agreement on a new global plastics treaty. If business as usual continues, plastic production will triple by 2060.

“The EU will remain firmly committed to finding a global solution. Our oceans, our environment and citizens around the globe need it.” 

The EU remains strongly in favour of such a global instrument and calls on the countries obstructing the deal to show more ambition when the preparations for a new negotiation process resume.

With plastics leaked into the environment forecasted to triple by 2060, half of all plastic waste still being landfilled and less than a fifth recycled, a decisive response to the global pollution crisis is needed.

Almost two-thirds of plastic waste in 2060 will be in the form of short-lived items such as packaging, low-cost products and textiles, according to the OECD.  

Lack of convergence around treaty objectives:

The negotiators sitting around the table could not unite around a text of a binding instrument with disagreements most notable on measures for the reduction of overall plastic production, the elimination of certain plastic products, chemicals of concern in products, improved design of plastics, extended producer responsibility and enhanced waste management.  

The main points of divergence were a possible target of reducing the production of primary plastic polymers, bans and restrictions of chemicals of concern in plastic products, as well as problematic and avoidable plastic products. It is on this that major oil-producing countries and the “High Ambition Coalition” countries which includes the EU, the UK, Canada, as well as many African, Latin American and Pacific countries could not find convergence.  

Even though no agreement was reached in Busan, the negotiating committee has made significant progress towards a deal by agreeing on a text that should serve as a basis for negotiations at the next meeting. An overwhelming majority of more than 100 countries shared the ambitions of the EU and the number of countries continues to grow. 

source:European Commission