Today's KNOWLEDGE Share : Injection Molding – Cavity Pressure Instrumentation
Today's KNOWLEDGE Share
Injection Molding – Cavity Pressure Instrumentation (Part 3)
How Many Sensors Do You Really Need?
Before answering that… let’s review the two real-world cases:
π Post 1 – Crisis Control
PURPOSE
Recover a failing process and stabilize production using cavity pressure transfer.
WHAT WAS DONE
- Cavity pressure used to control machine switchover (transfer)
- 3 sensors per cavity installed initially for validation and redundancy
Final plan:
→ validate the best location
→ remove extras and redeploy
TECH SETUP
Strain gage (direct) sensors
Simple controller → single input → transfer signal to press
RESULT
π Crisis averted - assembly line uninterrupted
π Process stabilized
π Scrap eliminated
π Facility adopted new control strategy - seeing is believing
π Post 2 – High Cavitation Recovery
PURPOSE
Save a 16-cavity tool from replacement by resolving chronic quality issues.
WHAT WAS DONE
- Strategic sensor placement based on quality data + short shot study
- 4 sensors total (not 16… just 4)
- Loadcells behind ejector pins (Indirect)
- Focus: capture imbalance, not measure everything
TECH SETUP
- Piezoelectric sensors behind ejector pins
- Charge amplifiers
- External process controller
- Defined monitoring limits
RESULT
π Zero customer complaints in 12-month period. Non-fill + flash issues eliminated.
π Tool returned to full production
π Indirect sensing performed reliably
COMMON MISCONCEPTION
Engineers often assume:
π “We need a sensor in every cavity… maybe even two (post-gate + end-of-fill).”
Maybe.
…but it depends on the objective.
CONSIDER THIS
- 16-cavity production tool
- 20 sec cycle
- ~7,000 production hours/year
- ~20 million parts made annually
Now ask yourself:
π How much of that is actually measured?
Current State
- Machine conditions are monitored
- Product quality is inferred
- Quality inspects 2 sample shots per shift (single shot)
CONCLUSION
π 20 million parts produced
π 0 parts measured in real-time at the cavity level
Quality is being judged based on:
machine behavior… not the plastic
WHAT IF…
We add just 2 cavity pressure sensors
NEW REALITY
- 2 cavities monitored out of 16
- Real-time process limits established
- Continuous validation of two cavities
π What That Means
- 12.5% of cavities directly monitored
- 2.5 million parts per year validated in real-time
π§ THE SHIFT
We went from:
π 0% direct measurement
to:
π millions of parts validated at the cavity level
π Every shot contained two validated parts
π‘ THE POINT
You don’t need to measure everything to dramatically improve control.
You just need to measure:
π something meaningful
π in the right location
π with a sensing chain that will perform well over millions of cycles
π₯ FINAL THOUGHT
The biggest leap in process control
isn’t going from 2 sensors → 16
It’s going from:
π 0 sensors → 1 meaningful measurement
Do you know what is happening inside your mold?
source : Rick Bujanowski

Comments
Post a Comment