Today's KNOWLEDGE Share : Injection Molding – Cavity Pressure Instrumentation

 Today's KNOWLEDGE Share

Injection Molding – Cavity Pressure Instrumentation (Part 3)


How Many Sensors Do You Really Need?

Before answering that… let’s review the two real-world cases:


πŸ” Post 1 – Crisis Control

PURPOSE

Recover a failing process and stabilize production using cavity pressure transfer.


WHAT WAS DONE

- Cavity pressure used to control machine switchover (transfer)

- 3 sensors per cavity installed initially for validation and redundancy

Final plan:

→ validate the best location

→ remove extras and redeploy


TECH SETUP

Strain gage (direct) sensors

Simple controller → single input → transfer signal to press


RESULT

πŸ‘‰ Crisis averted - assembly line uninterrupted

πŸ‘‰ Process stabilized

πŸ‘‰ Scrap eliminated

πŸ‘‰ Facility adopted new control strategy - seeing is believing


πŸ” Post 2 – High Cavitation Recovery

PURPOSE

Save a 16-cavity tool from replacement by resolving chronic quality issues.


WHAT WAS DONE

- Strategic sensor placement based on quality data + short shot study

- 4 sensors total (not 16… just 4)

- Loadcells behind ejector pins (Indirect)

- Focus: capture imbalance, not measure everything


TECH SETUP

- Piezoelectric sensors behind ejector pins

- Charge amplifiers

- External process controller

- Defined monitoring limits


RESULT

πŸ‘‰ Zero customer complaints in 12-month period. Non-fill + flash issues eliminated.

πŸ‘‰ Tool returned to full production

πŸ‘‰ Indirect sensing performed reliably


COMMON MISCONCEPTION

Engineers often assume:

πŸ‘‰ “We need a sensor in every cavity… maybe even two (post-gate + end-of-fill).”


Maybe.

…but it depends on the objective.


CONSIDER THIS

- 16-cavity production tool

- 20 sec cycle

- ~7,000 production hours/year

- ~20 million parts made annually


Now ask yourself:

πŸ‘‰ How much of that is actually measured?


Current State

- Machine conditions are monitored

- Product quality is inferred

- Quality inspects 2 sample shots per shift (single shot)


CONCLUSION

πŸ‘‰ 20 million parts produced

πŸ‘‰ 0 parts measured in real-time at the cavity level



Quality is being judged based on:

machine behavior… not the plastic


WHAT IF…

We add just 2 cavity pressure sensors


NEW REALITY

- 2 cavities monitored out of 16

- Real-time process limits established

- Continuous validation of two cavities


πŸ“Š What That Means

- 12.5% of cavities directly monitored

- 2.5 million parts per year validated in real-time


🧠 THE SHIFT

We went from:

πŸ‘‰ 0% direct measurement

to:

πŸ‘‰ millions of parts validated at the cavity level

πŸ‘‰ Every shot contained two validated parts


πŸ’‘ THE POINT

You don’t need to measure everything to dramatically improve control.


You just need to measure:

πŸ‘‰ something meaningful

πŸ‘‰ in the right location

πŸ‘‰ with a sensing chain that will perform well over millions of cycles


πŸ”₯ FINAL THOUGHT

The biggest leap in process control

isn’t going from 2 sensors → 16


It’s going from:

πŸ‘‰ 0 sensors → 1 meaningful measurement


Do you know what is happening inside your mold?


source : Rick Bujanowski

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today's KNOWLEDGE Share : What Is Going Wrong in UK Plastics Recycling?

Today's KNOWLEDGE Share : Robotic 3D printing can compete with traditional boatbuilding

Borealis’ new compounding line in Belgium offers premium recyclate-based polyolefins